The Supreme Court just handed the Biden Administration another defeat. The Biden Administration cancelled all of President Trump’s boarder policies, and released hundreds of thousands of migrants from Central America into the United States. They are doing this based on the belief that these migrants will eventually obtain citizenship and vote for them. The crime and the costs associated with this insane policy means nothing to the Biden Administration. It is all about obtaining indefinite political power. Thank gd President Trump got his SCOTUS picks through.
The remain in Mexico policy is simple: asylum seekers at our southern border must stay in Mexico until their hearing date, not come into our country illegally and stay unlawfully.
Pleased the Supreme Court ruled to reinstate it. https://t.co/H6RmtaQx7l
— Mike Pompeo (@mikepompeo) August 25, 2021
Supreme Court orders ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy reinstated
By AP, August 27, 2021
The Supreme Court says the Biden administration likely violated federal law in trying to end a Trump-era program that forces people to wait in Mexico while seeking asylum in the U.S.
With three liberal justices in dissent, the high court on Tuesday refused to block a lower court ruling ordering the administration to reinstate the program informally known as Remain in Mexico.
It’s not clear how many people will be affected and how quickly. Under the lower court ruling, the administration must make a “good faith effort” to restart the program.
There also is nothing preventing the administration from trying again to end the program, formally called Migrant Protection Protocols.
A federal judge in Texas had previously ordered that the program be reinstated last week. Both he and the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused the administration’s request to put the ruling on hold.
Justice Samuel Alito ordered a brief delay to allow the full court time to consider the administration’s appeal to keep the ruling on hold while the case continues to make its way through the courts.
The 5th Circuit ordered expedited consideration of the administration’s appeal.
The court offered little explanation for its action, although it cited its opinion from last year rejecting the Trump administration’s effort to end another immigration program, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. In that case, the court held that the decision to end DACA was “arbitrary and capricious,” in violation of federal law.
The administration has “failed to show a likelihood of success on the claim that the memorandum rescinding the Migrant Protection Protocols was not arbitrary and capricious,” the court wrote Tuesday in an unsigned order.
The three dissenting justices, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, did not write an opinion expressing their views of the case.
In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security said it regrets that the high court declined to issue a stay. The department said it would continue to challenge the district court’s order.
The American Civil Liberties Union called on the administration to present a fuller rationale for ending Remain in Mexico that could withstand court scrutiny.